基于综合赋权与云熵优化的园区综合能源系统评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(三峡大学电气与新能源学院,湖北 宜昌 443002)

通讯作者:

王朔浩(1999—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事综合能源系统研究;E?mail:806587554@qq.com

中图分类号:

TM732

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(52007103);国家电网有限公司总部科技项目(5100?202256008A?1?1?ZN)


Evaluation of park integrated energy system based on comprehensive weighting and cloud entropy optimization
Author:
Affiliation:

(College of Electrical Engineering and New Energy,China Three Gorges University,Yichang 443002,China)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [23]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    综合能源系统(integrated energy system,IES)作为能源转型中的重要环节已得到越来越多国家的广泛关注。构建一套匹配中国国情的综合能源系统评价体系和评价方法不仅能够为综合能源系统规划后评价打下基础,以此对规划方案进行优劣排序;还能够提高综合能源系统项目的管理水平,在制定统一、完整的综合能源系统综合评价标准时提供参考。为此,首先结合园区IES基本特征以及运行特性,构建包含经济性、可靠性、环保性以及智能友好性4个方面的综合评价指标体系;然后为解决IES在运行中的不确定性问题,对基于传统云物元模型的综合评价体系提出云熵优化,即考虑不同评价者对模糊性的可接受程度;为解决单一赋权方法可能导致的评价结果过于主观或过于客观的问题,选择基于最小鉴别信息原理将决策实验室法与熵权法相结合的综合赋权法,并采用变权法进一步完善综合评价指标;最后通过算例分析,验证所提综合评价体系的科学正确性。

    Abstract:

    As an important part of energy transformation, integrated energy system (IES) has attracted widespread attention from more and more countries. Establishing an evaluation system and method for IES that matches China's national conditions can not only lay a foundation for post-evaluation of IES planning and rank the planning schemes accordingly, but also improve the management level of IES projects and provide a reference for formulating a unified and complete IES evaluation criterion. To this end, combining the basic characteristics and operational features of the park IES, a comprehensive evaluation index system including four aspects of economy, reliability, environmental protection, and intelligence and friendliness is constructed. Then, to address the uncertainty of IES operation, the comprehensive evaluation system based on the traditional cloud matter-element model proposes cloud entropy optimization, considering the varying degrees of acceptability of fuzziness among different evaluators. To solve the problem that the evaluation results caused by a single weighting method may be too subjective or too objective, a comprehensive weighting method combining the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory method with the entropy weight method based on the principle of minimum discrimination information is selected, and the variable weight method is used to further improve the value of comprehensive evaluation index. Finally, the scientific correctness of the proposed comprehensive evaluation system is verified through case analysis.

    参考文献
    [1] 潘华,高旭,姚正,等.计及储能效益的综合能源系统利益分配机制研究[J].智慧电力,2022,50 (5): 25-32. PAN Hua,GAO Xu,YAO Zheng,et al.Benefit allocation of integrated energy system considering energy storage benefit[J].Smart Power,2022,50(5):25-32.
    [2] 郑云平,焦春雷,亚夏尔·吐尔洪,等.基于新能源发电的构网型协调储能控制策略研究[J].高压电器,2023,59(7):65-74. ZHENG Yunping,JIAO Chunlei,YASHAR Tuerhong,et al.Research on grid-forming coordinated energy storage control strategy based on converter-interfaced generation[J].High Voltage Apparatus,2023,59(7):65-74.
    [3] 蔡颖凯,张冶,曹世龙,等.面向综合需求响应的综合能源系统优化调度[J].电网与清洁能源,2022,38(9):65-72. CAI Yingkai,ZHANG Ye,CAO Shilong,et al.Optimal scheduling of the integrated electricity and natural gas system considering the integrated demand response[J].Power System and Clean Energy,2022,38(9):65-72.
    [4] 蒋燕,李秀峰,高道春,等.面向区域综合能源系统的电—气负荷联合预测研究[J].电测与仪表,2023,60(5):154-158. JIANG Yan,LI Xiufeng,GAO Daochun,et al.Research on combined forecasting of electricity-gas load for regional integrated energy system[J].Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation,2023,60(5):154-158.
    [5] 张世翔,吕帅康.面向园区微电网的综合能源系统评价方法[J].电网技术,2018,42(8):2431-2439. ZHANG Shixiang,Lü Shuaikang.Evaluation method of park-level integrated energy system for microgrid[J].Power System Technology,2018,42(8):2431-2439.
    [6] 陈柏森,廖清芬,刘涤尘,等. 区域综合能源系统的综合评估指标与方法[J]. 电力系统自动化,2018,42(4): 174-182. CHEN Baisen,LIAO Qingfen,LIU Dichen,et al.Comprehensive evaluation indices and methods for regional integrated energy system[J].Automation of Electric Power Systems,2018,42(4): 174-182.
    [7] 田立亭,程林,李荣,等.基于加权有向图的园区综合能源系统多场景能效评价方法[J].中国电机工程学报,2019,39(22):6471-6483. TIAN Liting,CHENG Lin,LI Rong,et al.A multi-scenario energy efficiency evaluation method for district multi-energy systems based on weighted directed graph[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2019,39(22):6471-6483.
    [8] 马丽叶,张涛,卢志刚,等.基于变权可拓云模型的区域综合能源系统综合评价[J].电工技术学报,2022,37(11):2789-2799. MA Liye,ZHANG Tao,LU Zhigang,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of regional integrated energy system based on variable weight extension cloud model[J].Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2022,37(11):2789-2799.
    [9] 罗宁,贺墨琳,高华,等.基于改进的AHP-CRITIC组合赋权与可拓评估模型的配电网综合评价方法[J].电力系统保护与控制,2021,49(16):86-96. LUO Ning,HE Molin,GAO Hua,et al.Comprehensive evaluation method for a distribution network based on improved AHP-CRITIC combination weighting and an extension evaluation model[J].Power System Protection and Control,2021,49(16):86-96.
    [10] 梁硕,王艳松.基于改进云物元模型的工业园区综合能源系统规划方案评价[J].电力系统保护与控制,2023,51(9):165-176. LIANG Shuo,WANG Yansong.Evaluation of an integrated energy system planning scheme for an industrial park based on an improved cloud matter-element model[J].Power System Protection and Control,2023,51(9):165-176.
    [11] 彭寒梅,彭紫洁,苏永新,等.基于LSSVM的电—气区域综合能源系统短期可靠性评估[J].电力系统自动化,2023,47(4):69-77. PENG Hanmei,PENG Zijie,SU Yongxin,et al.Short- term reliability evaluation of electricity-gas regional integrated energy system based on least squares support vector machine[J].Automation of Electric Power Systems,2023,47(4):69-77.
    [12] 任洲洋,王皓,李文沅,等.基于氢能设备多状态模型的电氢区域综合能源系统可靠性评估[J].电工技术学报,2023,38(24):6744-6759. REN Zhouyang,WANG Hao,LI Wenyuan,et al.Reliability evaluation of electricity-hydrogen regional integrated energy systems based on the multi-state models of hydrogen energy equipment[J].Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2023,38(24):6744-6759.
    [13] 罗毅,李昱龙.基于熵权法和灰色关联分析法的输电网规划方案综合决策[J].电网技术,2013,37(1):77-81. LUO Yi,LI Yulong.Comprehensive decision-making of transmission network planning based on entropy weight and grey relational analysis[J].Power System Technology,2013,37(1):77-81.
    [14] 闻旻.综合能源系统规划方案的综合评价方法研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2018. WEN Min.Research on comprehensive evaluation of integrated energy system planning[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2018.
    [15] 谷卫星,王婷婷,张鹏,等.基于组合赋权和TOPSIS的配电网CPS系统脆弱性评估[J].华北电力大学学报(自然科学版),2023,50(1):56-66+131.GU Weixing,WANG Tingting,ZHANG Peng,et al. Vulnerability assessment of distribution network CPS system based on combination empowerment and TOPSIS[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Natural Science Edition),2023,50(1):56-66+131.
    [16] 李志鹏,王建喜,周洪伟,等.计及多指标间相互影响的园区综合能源系统规划评价方法[J].电力建设,2022,43(10):98-110. LI Zhipeng,WANG Jianxi,ZHOU Hongwei,et al.Evaluation method for park-level integrated energy system planning considering the interaction of multiple indices[J].Electric Power Construction,2022,43(10):98-110.
    [17] 李志鹏,王建喜,周洪伟,等.计及多指标间相互影响的园区综合能源系统规划评价方法[J].电力建设,2022,43(10):98-110. LI Zhipeng,WANG Jianxi,ZHOU Hongwei,et al.Evaluation method for park-level integrated energy system planning considering the interaction of multiple indices[J].Electric Power Construction,2022,43(10):98-110.
    [18] 王永真,张靖,潘崇超,等.综合智慧能源多维绩效评价指标研究综述[J].全球能源互联网,2021,4(3):207-225. WANG Yongzhen,ZHANG Jing,PAN Chongchao,et al.Multi-dimensional performance evaluation index review of integrated and intelligent energy[J].Journal of Global Energy Interconnection,2021,4(3):207-225.
    [19] 刘荡荡.基于云物元模型与可变模糊集的电能质量综合评估方法研究[D].合肥:安徽大学,2020. LIU Dangdang.Research on power quality comprehensive evaluation method based on cloud matter-element model and variable fuzzy set[D].Hefei:Anhui University,2020.
    [20] 马丽叶,丁荣荣,卢志刚,等.基于可拓云模型的配电网经济运行综合评价及灵敏度分析[J].电工电能新技术,2016,35(7):8-16. MA Liye,DING Rongrong,LU Zhigang,et al.Comprehensive evaluation and sensitivity analysis for economic operation of distribution network based on extension cloud theory[J].Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy,2016,35(7):8-16.
    [21] 禹洪波,袁婉玲,汪敏,等.基于非对称贴近度证据云物元模型的电力变压器综合状态评估方法[J].电网技术,2021,45(9):3706-3713. YU Hongbo,YUAN Wanling,WANG Min,et al.Comprehensive condition assessment of power transformer based on asymmetric nearness degree evidence cloud matter-element model[J].Power System Technology,2021,45(9):3706-3713.
    [22] 杜江,孙铭阳.基于变权灰云模型的变压器状态层次评估方法[J].电工技术学报,2020,35(20):4306-4316. DU Jiang,SUN Mingyang.Hierarchical assessment method of transformer condition based on weight-varying grey cloud model[J].Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2020,35(20):4306-4316.
    [23] 蒋明喆,成贵学,赵晋斌.考虑动态荷储策略的综合能源系统双层规划模型[J].电力科学与技术学报,2022,37(5):44-57. JIANG Mingzhe,CHENG Guixue,ZHAO Jinbin.Double-deck planning model of integrated energy system in consideration of dynamic load energy storage strategy[J].Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology,2022,37(5):44-57.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

黄悦华,王朔浩,杨 楠,等.基于综合赋权与云熵优化的园区综合能源系统评价[J].电力科学与技术学报,2024,39(4):201-214.
HUANG Yuehua, WANG Shuohao, YANG Nan, et al. Evaluation of park integrated energy system based on comprehensive weighting and cloud entropy optimization[J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology,2024,39(4):201-214.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:143
  • 下载次数: 805
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-09-10
文章二维码